For Armenia, acceptance of Treaty of Kars means
renunciation of certain historic territories, historian says
05-05-2009 16:44:00 | Armenia | Politics
YEREVAN, MAY 5, NOYAN TAPAN. "History shows that the
Turkish diplomacy is always the winner at decisive moments,"
Edik Minasian, the Dean of Yerevan State University History
Department, said at the May 5 press conference. He reminded that
after World War I Turkey was on the verge of division into
parts, but it found a possibility to solve the issue in favor of
itself. According to the historian, now the Turks are again
trying to extort dividends beneficial for themselves in their
relations with the Armenians having a goal to achieve Armenia's
and Diaspora's renouncing the demand of international
recognition of the Armenian Genocide and solution of the Nagorno
Karabakh problem in favor of Azerbaijan.
E. Minasian added that he has doubts concerning some
analysts' conviction that Turkey can establish relations with
Armenia without preconditions. "The Turks will not sign a
memorandum for no particular reason," he said touching upon the
April 22 statement signed by the Armenian and Turkish Foreign
Ministers.
Commenting upon the information spread by Turkish media
that by that document Armenia has agreed to accept the Treaty of
Kars, E. Minasian said that he does not know whether that news
corresponds to reality. However, if it is right, according to E.
Minasian's formulation, for Armenia, acceptance of the Treaty of the
Kars means renunciation of certain historic territories and the
Treaty of Sevres. The historian reminded that by the Treaty of
Kars the Armenians ceded a territory of 24 thousand sq.km to
Turkey, Kars and Surmalu were given to Turkey and Nakhichevan to
Azerbaijan.