BUSH TO SEND AMB. HOAGLAND ELSEWHERE AFTER NOMINATION TO
ARMENIA IS BLOCKED
25-07-2007 18:35:00 | USA | Articles and Analyses
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier
After languishing for more than a year in Washington, D.C.,
Richard Hoagland, U.S. Ambassador Designate to Armenia, is about
to be reassigned to another country, according to several
confidential but highly reliable sources. Hoagland, who was
U.S. Ambassador to Tajikistan in 2006, was nominated by Pres.
Bush to replace John Evans as U.S. Ambassador to Armenia. Evans
was forced into early retirement last year, after he used the
words "Armenian Genocide" to describe the mass murder of
Armenians in Turkey, during his visit to California in February
2005. Even after his public apology for this "indiscretion," the
State Department still pressured the American Foreign Service
Association to rescind the "Constructive Dissent" Award that
Amb. Evans was selected to receive.
Armenian-Americans were incensed that the career of a
seasoned diplomat like Amb. Evans was being cut short due to his
use of a single word. They were deeply offended that State
Department officials did not have the decency to publicly
announce the reason for Amb. Evans' forced exit. When asked to
comment on the news of Amb. Evans' recall, various U.S.
officials kept repeating like a broken record that "ambassadors
serve at the pleasure of the President."
Since the Turkish Ambassador to the U.S. and lobbyists
hired by Turkey had protested to the Bush administration about
Amb. Evans' "taboo" statement on the Armenian Genocide, some
wondered whether U.S. ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the
President of Turkey or the President of the United States!
In response to the disrespect shown by the State Department
toward the Armenian-American community and particularly the
critical issue of the Armenian Genocide, Armenian-Americans
asked that the U.S. Senate block the nomination of Amb.
Hoagland. After lengthy debates in the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee, Sen. Robert Menendez (Dem.-N.J.) placed a hold on
Hoagland's nomination, thus blocking his assignment as the next
ambassador to Armenia.
Requests by this writer and others asking the State
Department to meet with Armenian-American community leaders and
come to a mutually acceptable solution were ignored. Bush
Administration officials kept repeating that Hoagland remained
the President's nominee, disingenuously claiming that it was
important for Armenia to have a U.S. Ambassador. If it were that
important for the United States to have an Ambassador in
Yerevan, many wondered why had the Bush administration recalled
the fine ambassador - John Evans - it already had in place?
Furthermore, on several occasions during the year when the
Senate was in recess or on vacation, Pres. Bush declined to use
his authority to appoint Amb. Hoagland without Senate approval.
The administration must have recognized that circumventing the
Senate would have had negative consequences for both the nominee
and the President himself.
The administration also opted not to withdraw the nominee's
name from further Senate consideration.
Instead, when the newly-elected Congress started its
deliberations in early January, Pres. Bush's advisors, showing
complete lack of political judgment, talked the President into
resubmitting Hoagland's name to the Senate. Sen. Menendez then
placed a new hold on his nomination, thus ensuring that the
Senate would not approve Hoagland as Ambassador to Armenia.
Since the State Department had rejected all offers to meet
with Armenian-American community leaders to discuss Hoagland's
nomination, and the President had not exercised his right to
make a recess appointment, the only sensible option left on the
table was to withdraw Hoagland's nomination and replace him with
another nominee. The administration was repeatedly assured that
should another reasonable name be submitted to the Senate, there
would no objection or obstruction from the Armenian community
and the U.S. Senate.
At last, it appears that the administration has come to the
conclusion that Hoagland's nomination is hopelessly dead in the
water. The State Department is finally willing to drop its
oft-announced position that Hoagland remains its nominee for
Armenia.
After languishing for a whole year at an empty desk in the
State Department, Amb. Hoagland deserves to have an assignment
at a diplomatic post in a country other than Armenia. He has
been caught in the midst of a controversy not of his own doing.
His superiors' mismanagement of this issue should no longer keep
his career in limbo.
Only time will tell if the Bush administration has properly
understood from this episode the deeply-felt sentiments of the
Armenian-American community. In view of the embarrassment
suffered by the State Department on this occasion, it is hoped
that, henceforth, the administration would think long before
showing any more disrespect toward the Armenian-American
community on the core issue of the Armenian Genocide.