1% OF ANNUAL INCOMES OF 30 COMPANIES SURVEYED BY AMERIA
DIRECTED TO SOCIAL INVESTMENT SECTOR
10-11-2006 15:57:00 | Armenia | Economy
YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 10, NOYAN TAPAN. According to a study of
30 economic entities conducted by Ameria consulting company,
they direct up to 1% of their annual incomes to the social
investment (SI) sector. Representative of Ameria Davit
Karapetian stated this during a round table "Corporate Social
Investments" held by Eurasia Foundation on November 10.
According to D. Karapetian, experts of Ameria conducted
interviews with 30 businessmen, 70% of whose companies operate
in Yerevan. 46% of them represent big enterprises, the rest -
medium ones. 37% of businessmen surveyed represent the
production sphere, 33% - services, the rest - trade and mixed
activity. The survey included companies of food processing,
precise engineering, IT and elctronics, banking and publishing
sectors, recreational activity, tourism, mining industry,
construction, infrastructure servicing, trade and export, as
well as representatives of industrial and trade groups.
According to the study results, 44% of surveyed businessmen
make social investments in Yerevan. Most of social investments
is made in science, culture, health and education, including
within companies. Most of SI in Armenia is made in the form of
humanitarian, charity, private sponsorship or one-off aid. Most
of those surveyed are interested in making most coordinated
social investments.
As for motives for making SI, most of those surveyed said
that the first motive is "to get contents". "Moral
responsibility and patriotism" were also mentioned as motives.
Many of businessmen surveyed noted that they do not extend
SI due to not receiving long-term positive changes after making
such investments.
According to a study of Ameria, 23% of those surveyed
neglected and even ignored the role of social organizations when
coordinating social investments of business. According to 22% of
them, the main role of international organizations is direct
financial participation in SI, in the opinion of 11% -
implementation of special SI programs with the state, and
according to 17% - technical assistance.
Those surveyed considered the support and coordination of
SI together with the private sector and NGOs as the most
important function of the state in the SI sector.
Only 14% of those surveyed noted the absence of financial
resources as the main obstacle to making social investments. 50%
of them takes the view that it is necessary to make amendments
in the tax legislation for extension of social invsetment and
improve the policy conducted in the SI sector. Over one third
noted that the improved mechanisms of providing information on
IS and their benefits may increase the number of businessmen
included in SI.